Pyramid Power: A Reply to Commentaries.

Genetic Epidemiology 11:463-472 (1994) Direction of Causation: Reply to Commentaries

We reply to the commentaries on the lead papers by Neale et al. [1994a] and Duffy and Martin [1994]. Topics covered include power calculations, cross-sectional measurement vs. lifetime reports, the appropriateness of the direction of causation (DOC) model, extensions to study causation between the latent variables, sampling of subjects, and heterogeneity. We consider the potential of combining ...

How Practitioners Can Use Evidence-based Forecasting: Reply to Commentaries

The commentaries reinforce my belief that research evidence alone is not sufficient for organizations to consider new methods. I suggest procedures to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based findings. Comments Postprint version. Published in Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, Volume 5, 2006, pages 14-15. This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: ht...

The Politics and Power of Populism: A Response to the Recent Commentaries

Toward a theory of verbal behavior.

This paper is a reply to an accompanying set of six commentaries by Sidman; Hayes and Barnes; Schusterman, Kastak, and Reichmuth; Tonneau and Sokolowski; Lowenkron; and Moerk. Those commentaries were prompted by our article ‘‘On the Origins of Naming and Other Symbolic Behavior’’ (1996), which was, in turn, followed by 26 commentaries and a reply. In the course of the present reply, we further ...

REPLY Marriage at the Summit: Response to the Commentaries

This article serves as a response to the 13 commentaries on the target article, which introduced the suffocation model of marriage in America. This reply has four main sections. First, it presents an elaborated version of the suffocation model that was inspired by the commentaries. Second, it addresses three areas of significant disagreement that emerged as we digested the commentaries. Third, ...